More than ever, insider threats remain among the most challenging attacks to detect and the most damaging to mitigate. Threats from individuals with authorized access are a critical focus of the CMMC, particularly at Levels 2 and 3, which mandate strong controls to combat social engineering and threats from employees or other internal stakeholders.

This article explores how these foundational standards address insider threat vectors, enabling organizations to better protect CUI in an increasingly hostile threat landscape.

Understanding the Insider Threat Risk Landscape

Insider threats are actions taken by trusted individuals—employees, contractors, or partners—who have authorized access to systems and data but misuse that access maliciously or inadvertently. For contractors in the defense industrial base and federal supply chains, such threats pose a substantial risk to CUI. Unlike external threats, insiders can bypass many traditional perimeter defenses due to their position. This risk is amplified in organizations that lack rigorous access controls, personnel screening, behavioral monitoring, and incident response protocols.

Because of this, the U.S. Department of Defense and NIST have incorporated insider threat mitigation as a core focus of their security guidelines and frameworks, particularly in SP 800-171 and SP 800-172, which underpin CMMC Level 2 and Level 3 compliance, respectively.

CMMC and Threat Security

CMMC 2.0 defines three levels of cybersecurity maturity:

Level 1: Basic Federal Contract Information (FCI) safeguarding.
Level 2: Aligns with the 110 requirements in NIST SP 800-171 to protect CUI.
Level 3: Adds enhanced security requirements from NIST SP 800-172 to defend against advanced persistent threats.

The insider threat challenge primarily affects Level 2 and 3, where organizations are expected to implement multi-layered security controls, including those focused on personnel risk, anomalous behavior, and privileged access management.

How NIST SP 800-171 Addresses Insider Threats

While SP 800-171 is not explicitly an insider threat framework, its 17 control families embed several critical protections that directly mitigate insider risks. The constellation of controls here helps you better track suspicious behavior and minimize the risk that employees will take liberties with data or application access.

Awareness and Training (AT)

Requirement 03.02.01: Mandates security awareness training that includes insider threat indicators, social engineering techniques, and reporting procedures.
Requirement 03.02.02: Requires role-based training for users with elevated access, reinforcing responsibility and risk awareness.

These controls establish a human firewall that complements technical defenses by ensuring that personnel understand how insider threats manifest and how to report them.

Personnel Security (PS)

Requirement 03.09.01: Requires screening of individuals before granting access to systems containing CUI.
Requirement 03.09.02: Mandates the formal process for revoking access when individuals leave or change roles.

These controls are foundational in reducing the risk of disgruntled or compromised employees retaining access to sensitive data.

Access Control (AC) and Least Privilege

Requirement 03.01.01 through 03.01.07: Define strict account management, access authorization, and least privilege enforcement, including disabling inactive accounts and logging privileged function usage.

Minimizing access scope and enforcing role-based separation of duties limit the opportunities for insiders to abuse privileges.

NIST SP 800-172: Enhanced Protections for CUI and High-Value Assets

SP 800-172 introduces a series of enhanced security requirements designed to protect CUI when associated with high-value assets or critical programs—situations where insider threats intersect with nation-state-level risks. These controls reflect a shift toward zero-trust principles, behavioral analytics, and cyber resiliency.

Dual Authorization (3.1.1e): This control requires two individuals to execute critical operations. By introducing non-repudiation and accountability, dual authorization deters lone insiders from making unauthorized system changes or exfiltrating CUI.
Enhanced Personnel Screening (3.9.1e): This requirement mandates more rigorous screening, including reinvestigation, for personnel in roles with elevated access to CUI. It recognizes that insider threats can emerge long after onboarding and that periodic reassessment is essential.
Adverse Information Handling (3.9.2e): Organizations must act on any adverse information (e.g., signs of financial distress, erratic behavior) by reassessing an individual’s access. This reflects a risk-based approach where behavioral or contextual red flags can trigger access restrictions or investigations.
Behavior Monitoring (3.14.2e): Unlike static access control logs, this control mandates real-time detection of behavioral anomalies—sudden spikes in data access, unusual working hours, or accessing unneeded files. These techniques form the basis of modern insider threat detection platforms.
Threat Hunting (3.11.2e): Security teams must proactively search for indicators of insider compromise using hunt team techniques, rather than relying solely on reactive alerts. This anticipatory approach is essential for identifying sophisticated insiders who attempt to cover their tracks.

Coordinating Responses Across Your Organization

While proactive detection and access control are vital, organizations must also be prepared to respond swiftly and decisively when insider threats are detected. NIST SP 800-172 stresses the importance of building mature incident response and monitoring capabilities tightly integrated with day-to-day security operations.

SOCs are the front lines for detecting and triaging suspicious activity. A well-functioning SOC should be equipped with behavioral analytics platforms, endpoint detection and response tools, and threat intelligence feeds to distinguish potential insider threats from benign anomalies.

Computer Incident Response Teams (CIRTs) can complement a SOC, coordinating containment, investigation, and remediation when threats materialize. In the context of insider threats, CIRT teams must:

Maintain detailed chain-of-custody procedures to ensure the integrity of forensic evidence.
Conduct thorough root cause analyses to understand the origin and intent behind insider activity.
Provide actionable feedback on risk assessments and security architecture to close any gaps exploited during the incident.

Ultimately, coordinated response capability is not simply about minimizing immediate damage. It is about fostering a continuous improvement cycle that strengthens an organization’s ability to anticipate, detect, and withstand future insider risks.

Be Ready for Insider Threats with Lazarus Alliance

For organizations seeking CMMC Level 2 or 3 certification, insider threat mitigation is not optional—it’s operationally and strategically imperative. By implementing the layered controls outlined in the NIST publications, organizations can materially reduce the risk of insider compromise while aligning with federal expectations for safeguarding CUI.

To learn more about how Lazarus Alliance can help, contact us.

[wpforms id=”137574″]

Call +1 (888) 896-7580 for Proactive Cyber Security© Services and Solutions

How CMMC Mitigates Insider Threats