With the ever-increasing complexities of the IT and business environments, risk management has become crucially important for cybersecurity. Accordingly, risk management methodologies provide the blueprint for this anticipatory and strategic approach. They guide businesses in identifying potential threats, assessing their impact, devising effective responses, and monitoring progress.
This article will introduce some basics of risk management methodologies and how they fit with different risk-based security frameworks.
What Are Risk Assessment Methodologies?
Cybersecurity risk management is the assessment and handling of an organization’s exposure to security threats and vulnerabilities. A risk assessment might involve identifying vulnerabilities, predicting threats, estimating threat likelihood, and calculating the damages to the organization if they occur.
Broadly speaking, there are two primary approaches to risk assessment: qualitative and quantitative. Both methods are integral parts of risk management, but they differ in both approach and insights provided:
- Qualitative: In a qualitative risk assessment, risks are assessed based on categories and subjective analyses rather than exact measurements. Qualitative risk assessments are relatively easy to perform and do not require a deep level of data. They may lead to inconsistent evaluations compared to quantitative assessments.
- Quantitative: Quantitative risk assessment, on the other hand, seeks to assign values to risks. This method involves gathering data about potential threats and vulnerabilities and using this data to calculate the likelihood and impact of a given risk item. This is a more accurate if also more costly and complex, methodology.
In practice, many organizations use a combination of both methods. For example, a qualitative risk assessment can identify and prioritize risks quickly. Then a quantitative risk assessment can further analyze the most significant risks.
What Are Some Risk-Focused Security Frameworks?
With the rise of complex security threats and large, multi-faceted infrastructures, many cybersecurity frameworks have started leaning towards risk-based methodologies. This requires that a compliant organization take a comprehensive approach to security through the lens of risk management.
Some of these frameworks include:
- Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE): OCTAVE is a suite of tools and methods for risk-based information security strategic assessment and planning. It involves three phases: building asset-based threat profiles, identifying infrastructure vulnerabilities, and developing security strategies and plans.
- NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF): The NIST RMF is a US federal government policy and standard that defines a process that integrates security and risk management activities into development and management lifecycles. The RMF is widely used across both government and private sectors worldwide.
- ISO/IEC 27005: This international standard is dedicated to information security risk management. The standard provides guidelines for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security risk management system within the organization’s context.
- Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission Enterprise Risk Management (COSO ERM): This model is a widely accepted framework for managing compliance risks in enterprises so they align with certain requirements, especially tied to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The best methodology for a given organization will depend on that organization’s contextual needs related to its size, industry, regulatory environment, and risk appetite.
Are These Frameworks Qualitative or Quantitative Methodologies?
The methodologies mentioned earlier can be used for qualitative and quantitative risk assessments. However, they might lean more toward one or the other.
These frameworks breakdown as follows:
- OCTAVE: Primarily qualitative. This approach systematically examines organizational needs, assets, threats, and vulnerabilities, focusing on strategic, practice-related, and operational risks. Quantitative aspects are included, but the focus is more on the qualitative side.
- NIST RMF: Both quantitative and qualitative. NIST RMF involves identifying risks, categorizing them, and applying relevant controls. The assessment process can involve quantitative measures (such as estimates of potential financial loss) and qualitative measures (such as categorizing risks as low, medium, or high).
- ISO/IEC 27005: Both quantitative and qualitative. The ISO/IEC 27005 standard provides information security risk management guidelines and allows for quantitative and qualitative risk assessments, depending on what’s most appropriate for the context.
- COSO ERM: Both quantitative and qualitative. COSO ERM framework is designed to accommodate both qualitative and quantitative approaches to risk assessment.
Remember, whether a qualitative or quantitative approach (or a combination of both) is used will depend on the context and demands of the organization.
What Are Different Methodologies for Risk Mitigation?
Even with well-structured risk management techniques, it’s nearly impossible to eliminate it. That’s why risk management methodologies will always include some idea of how to approach security incidents before or after they occur.
Some common approaches include:
- Avoidance: This strategy involves avoiding the risk altogether. This might mean avoiding risky actions or technologies, like disallowing the storage of sensitive data on specific servers to avoid data breaches.
- Reduction or Mitigation: This strategy involves taking steps to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. This could include implementing security controls called for in cybersecurity frameworks to avoid specific threats.
- Transfer: This strategy involves transferring the risk to another party. This is often done through insurance. For example, an organization might purchase cybersecurity insurance to cover the costs if a data breach occurs.
- Acceptance: This strategy involves accepting the risk and the potential consequences. For example, an organization may forego implementing specific, advanced security measures if they are not required, even if they introduce some risk.
- Sharing: In some cases, organizations can share cybersecurity risks with partners. This is often seen in collaborative projects where multiple parties are involved. Each entity assumes a portion of the responsibility for managing the security risk.
The right approach depends on the specific risk and the context of the organization, including factors like its risk appetite, regulations, and financial or reputational impact.
Embed Risk Assessment Into Your Compliance Infrastructure with Continuum GRC
Continuum GRC is a cloud platform that can take something as routine and necessary as regular vulnerability scanning and reporting under FedRAMP and make it an easy and timely part of business in the public sector. We provide risk management and compliance support for every major regulation and compliance framework on the market, including:
- NIST 800-53
- FARS NIST 800-171
- SOC 1, SOC 2
- PCI DSS 4.0
- IRS 1075
- COSO SOX
- ISO 27000 Series
- ISO 9000 Series
And more. We are the only FedRAMP and StateRAMP Authorized compliance and risk management solution worldwide.
Continuum GRC is a proactive cyber security® and the only FedRAMP and StateRAMP Authorized cybersecurity audit platform worldwide. Call 1-888-896-6207 to discuss your organization’s cybersecurity needs and find out how we can help your organization protect its systems and ensure compliance.
[wpforms id= “43885”]